Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  34 / 54 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 54 Next Page
Page Background

AfA Special

Features

34

Forward Magazine

Q

Summer 2016

Airforwarders Association

Intermediary may find themselves exposed

with no protection via insurance.

1. The BCO misstates VGM on an export

and transmits a false VGM which is

less than actual VGM. The container is

involved in a bodily injury or property

damage claim and the BCO’s general

liability insurer denies coverage citing that

the claim was not a fortuitous occurrence.

2. The BCO acting as importing knowingly

accepts overweight containers from its

overseas supplier and one such container

is involved in a bodily injury or property

damage claim. The BCO’s general liability

insurer denies coverage citing that the

claim was not a fortuitous occurrence.

3. The Transportation Intermediary

knowingly accepts incorrect VGM

documentation and am overweight

container is involved in a bodily

injury or property damage claim. The

Transportation Intermediary’s general

liability insurer denies coverage citing that

the claim was not a fortuitous occurrence.

4. A third party BCO seeks to recover

consequential losses from an NVOCC

who consolidated individual BCO

shipments into an overweight container

and knowingly transmitted inaccurate

VGM. The Transportation Intermediary’s

Professional Liability Insurance and/or

Cargo Liability Insurance would likely

deny the claim citing an exclusion similar

to one of these which has been extracted

from the most common Professional

Liability and Cargo Liability Insurance

forms in the US market. Example 1,

Exclusions, this policy does not apply

to any claim arising out of dishonest,

criminal, fraudulent, malicious, or

knowingly wrongful act of any insured

or willful violation of any ordinance.

Example 2 Exclusions, this insurance

does not cover: Losses due to infidelity,

conversion, or dishonest acts of the

Assured, or the Assureds’ employees.

5. A BCO seeks to recover a loss via their

cargo insurer following a container/

truck overturn, container floor collapse,

with a container the BCO loaded. The

cargo insurer may try and deny the

claim citing improper packing or

willful misconduct.

6. If fines and penalties become part

of SOLAS VGM enforcement, most

intermediary policies will not cover fines

and penalties if they are assessed directly

against the transportation intermediary.

Depending upon the circumstances,

fines and penalties imposed upon a

shipper for negligent actions caused by

the intermediary would likely be covered

under the intermediary’s professional

liability policy.

Best Practices for BCOs and

Transportation Intermediaries

Both BCOs and Transportation

Intermediaries must take their

responsibilities for SOLAS VGA

compliance seriously and be able to

evidence a process that places accountability

on the individuals responsible for this task.

BCOs and Transportation Intermediaries

have a shared responsibility and are co-

dependent on each other for full compliance

so there should be full transparency as to

the responsibilities of each entity.

Some considerations:

1. Transportation Intermediaries should

broaden BCO indemnification agreements

in their Terms and Conditions of Service

to address SOLAS VGM and BCOs may

want to consider incorporating reference

SOLAS VGM compliance in their own

Master Service Agreements. Insurers

must be more diligent at reviewing TI

Terms and Conditions as part of their

underwriting process as this will serve to

help insurer and insured minimize losses.

2. The traditional silos of risk management

and trade compliance need to come

together on SOLAS VGM to ensure that

all parties understand their responsibilities

and the possible consequences of less than

complete compliance.

Risk management within BCO and

Intermediary companies need to reinforce

the importance of taking a risk vs. reward

view on activities within the company to

avoid the price and price only decision of

freight and logistics vendor selection.

[1] Richard Williams and Mark Adams of the

Mercatus Center, George Mason University

discuss the impacts of too many regulations on

companies that simply cannot properly comply

with all of the regulations they are supposed to

follow. See Regulatory Overload –Mercatus on

Policy No. 103 February 2012,http://mercatus.

org/sites/default/files/Regulatory_Overload_

WilliamsAdams_MOP103.pdf

[2]

http://www.vanbloislaw.com/case-

results/1650000-settlement-truck-plunges-off-

bay-bridge-at-s-curve/